Transforming Bureaucratic Cultures
By: Warren Master
Warren Master is Editor-in-Chief & Board Chairman, The Public Manager (www.thepublicmanager.org)
Over the past decade or so, government at all levels has begun requiring short- and long-term plans, including strategic goals, measurable objectives, a system for assessing outcomes and periodic reporting on results. Beginning with the federal CFO Act of 1990, followed by related measures such as the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Government Management Reform Act of 1994 (GMRA) and the IT Management Reform Act of 1996 (ITMRA or Clinger-Cohen), among others, pressure has mounted to achieve greater accountability. More recently, decision makers have attempted to tie budget and other resource decisions to agency performance.
Ironically, this shift to a more results-oriented management system hasn’t yet made a noticeable dent in public sector organizational culture. This observation is warranted because, for such a transformation to have occurred would have surely nudged most culture-bearers out of their bureaucratic silos and stovepipes. For example, in a post-silo organizational culture, budget and financial management analysts would be regularly collaborating with technologists, acquisition specialists, agency planners, HR counterparts and others to assure that co-lateral strategies support agency budget priorities.
Major Transformational Challenges
So what are the most challenging “haystacks” we face at this time—15 years after passage of GPRA?
Performance
Starting with the performance challenge itself, to what extent have the various team elements planned, resourced and orchestrated initiatives to foster a performance culture? How have they assured that all contributors understand the link between the procurement process and vendor performance? Between setting budget priorities that help guide agency investment decisions and justifying and reporting on the measurable outcomes of agency training efforts? To set standards, hold organizations accountable and consider changes to HR law, personnel policies and systems, and other innovative ideas in pursuit of a performance-based culture?
Accountability
Moving to accountability challenges, how have agency strategic emphases shifted to address priority oversight needs? Performance measurement aside, what pressing demands need to be addressed in the area of ethics? What is being planned to assure basic performance measurement acumen and distribute responsibility appropriately in a multi-sector workforce? How have new technologies given agencies more effective tools and techniques to assess and mitigate risks and assure proper internal controls? Moreover, how have organizations raised the bar on managing and sharing costs and employing more results-oriented budgeting techniques?
Human Capital
As for human capital, how have workplace learning efforts focused on measuring performance and linking pay and performance (where applicable)? Given the complex, wide variety and pressing nature of the transformative challenges facing today’s government organizations, what are agencies doing to prepare their current and future leaders and managers to drive this change over the next several decades?
Technology
How do agency strategies assure that the organization will keep pace with new technologies and rising E-governance expectations among all relevant users—citizens, the business community AND a younger more Web-savvy work force? Also, the public sector has slowly made increasing use of telework and other flexible workplace arrangements. What are agencies doing to become “telework-ready” to ensure continuity of government operations in the event of a significant work stoppage?
Communication
How are government organizations balancing the need for internal controls and confidentiality with the demand for increased freedom of information? Given the volume, pace and complexity of policy formulation activities, how are government agencies engaging citizens today—particularly in the context of new communication technologies? Given the inter-dependent nature of today’s public sector challenges and solutions, government agencies and occupational groupings will need to go outside their own vertically integrated comfort zones and interact with other bureaucratic sub-cultures to achieve priority outcomes. How are agencies reaching out across traditional boundaries, and how are basic organization assumptions and behaviors changing with respect to sharing information and collaboration in planning, sourcing and managing efforts of common importance?
Governance
Going beyond inter-institutional communication, how have bureaucratic cultures evolved to share responsibility for achieving results? What are different levels of government doing to prepare for and respond more collaboratively to catastrophic disasters, and how are lessons learned institutionally shared with others? Moreover, more and more government work requirements have been sourced to private contractors. Given the need to measure and report on the performance of all parties, how are organizations communicating oversight and accountability roles and responsibilities in such a demanding, resource-stretched environment? In this regard, how have government organizations successfully engaged the private sector, achieving high performance while remaining faithful to their missions and code of ethics and protecting the proprietary needs of their business community counterparts?
MONDAY: Eric Berman, Deputy Comptroller, Commonwealth of Massachusetts; AGA GASAC Representative